What are the difference is between Davinci Resolve and Davinci Resolve studio?.Is it safe to use the Davinci Resolve Beta?.New DNxHR encoding and decoding lets customers work natively and share the same high resolution media files, and improved AAF import and export lets editors and colorists round trip projects with Media Composer 8.3 more accurately and reliably than ever before. That means customers will get dramatically better images when moving to reduced color spaces because colors are transformed using new algorithms designed to minimize clipping and provide amazing results.ĭaVinci Resolve 11.2 also makes it easier to work with Avid editors because you can now move both high resolution media and sequences back and forth between the two systems. New soft clip options are now available when converting high dynamic range CinemaDNG RAW images into Rec. Customers can take advantage of new colorspace transform enhancements when decoding RAW files for more realistic Rec. For the most part the free version is identical to the paid.ĭaVinci Resolve 11.2 includes improvements to CinemaDNG RAW image processing that makes working with files shot on Blackmagic digital film cameras look even better than before. The paid version has a few other capabilities, like a denoiser, that the free doesn't, but if you already have a denoiser plugin(ofx) it will work in free resolve. Add to that the best tracking capabilities on the planet, way better and easier than even aftereffects new tracking and its hard to beat. That said, Resolve is so massively better at color correction than anything else, final cut, adobe, avid, frankly it embarrasses them. If that's all you plan on doing in your color correction it isn't worth it. You can just drop in a lut or an ofx plug in in resolve. You will have to study and watch videos (Denver Riddle) to get any good at it. Is it worth the effort? Plus resolve is complicated to learn. Even if you do changes after the initial render the edits will update automatically. You only have to render one time before the release render. Just watch a video on roundtripping and follow every step. If, however, you then want to do editing changes back in premeire or add effects in after fx, after coloring you will have to render and that would be a roundtrip. If you do all your editing cuts in premeire and than want to color in resolve, there's no roundtripping, just an export. But if it's a real shoot with multiple scenes and special fx and audio issues, premiere is clearly better. Davinci's editing is okay if you just need a few scenes put together. I do see what you are getting at - it would be great to somehow be able to switch into Resolve to grade some footage and then switch back to your editor and instantly have graded footage in your timeline - but that's not unfortunately how it works. I take my hat off to anyone who uses it professionally and at speed! I find Resolve's new editing capabilities a bit clunky, and also it would involve transcoding all my GH2 footage, so I much prefer to edit in Sony Vegas and export the final shots into Resolve using a Resolve-friendly format, and then export the finished footage back into Vegas for adding titles etc - so yes, you have to round-trip between programs - but Resolve is worth it if you have the time (and the need) to do it (and can put in the hours required to learn what it can do). You don't have to use it for every shot - you could just load the ones you want and treat those. I guess it is complicated depending on what you're used to, but it can be well worth it to do things which couldn't be done with conventional software, for example being able to track and correct moving objects within an image.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |